Four things worth knowing, none of which will help you at work.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT |
THU 15:04
|
|
|
Issue 01 · Thursday afternoon
|
It’s time, WFH tomorrow so it’s basically WFH from now. How do I lob as many things as I can into other people’s courts so I can chill tomorrow and turn up on Monday talking like I got sh*t done? | Instead, here’s four things worth knowing, none of which will help you at work. | Silicon Valley Bank was reportedly dreamed up over a poker game. - How would you feel about a $10k buy-in to start a company with the people you’ve just lost money to around a poker table? Welcome to SVB in 1983.
- Now imagine building it for forty years only to have it killed in 36 hours by depositors coordinating in group chats.
- Started at a poker table, ended in a Slack channel. There’s a whole thesis in there and I’m not going to write it.
| In 2017 Austria sold a bond that matures in 2117. - Yielding at 2.1% btw.
- They were absolutely snapped up at the time then collapsed 55–65% from peaks, proving that you can lose more money in a AAA government bond than in a bad tech stock if you’re patient enough.
- FYI, they saw this and introduced an even lower-yielding (0.85%) century bond in 2020. Lesson learned?
| Some large employers have taken out life insurance on rank-and-file staff and collected the payout themselves. - “Dead peasant” insurance (serious ring to it) was taken out mainly by retail chains in the 80s and 90s.
- Imagine being the family of a shelf stacker who gets nothing after the employer is done.
- Worth remembering next time your employer describes itself as a family.
| Tulip mania basically didn’t happen. - Maybe one of the first recorded instances of fake news — the thriving Dutch economy was completely unfazed by the adjustment in tulip bulb prices.
- The version everyone knows — a nation ruined, merchants leaping into canals — comes from a sensationalist book published in 1841, nearly two centuries after the fact.
- The most famous bubble in history is mostly a bloke selling books.
| The longer one | Why the scam emails are so badly written | You open your inbox and see Nigerian prince right there in the subject line, delete it and pat yourself on the back for being a good corporate robot. Then you think, how does anyone fall for it? | These things seem like they’re designed to fail. | A Microsoft researcher worked through the economics of it about a decade ago and found that the expensive part of the scam isn’t sending emails, but rather the weeks of back-and-forth with someone who eventually wakes up and stops replying. | So the opening email isn’t advertising. It’s a filter. Make it as ludicrous as possible and everyone who bins it would have wasted the scammer’s next three weeks anyway. What’s left is a tiny group of people who read Nigerian prince and thought seems plausible. A self-excluding marketing ploy — maybe these guys are smarter than I thought. | Once you see that terrible wording IS the play, you start noticing the same move everywhere: the deliberately weird job ad, the aggressively niche landing page, the founder whose pitch is so strange it either lands instantly or not at all. | Filtering hard at the top is cheaper than being polite in the middle. | Course materials |  | That’s it. Go home. |
|
Professional Development · sent Thursdays, when it stops mattering Issue 01 | SUBSCRIBE → |
|
|